My blog post will be about my response
paper. In the last blog post I made a biting criticism of Alexandra Rowe’s post
about how pop culture is important to academia. Whether I believe this or not
is not important. What is important is that I relay how much I enjoy creating
an argument. So I asked myself what would be the most enjoyable prompt for my
response paper and I chose option number 1 and decided to rail against my
comment about her blog post. By seeking a compelling answer against my knee-jerk
reaction to attack her point that “cotton candy”or popular culture is important to academia I
uncovered new insights I wouldn’t of found if left to my own devices.
“Dr. Strangelove” is a film about the
funny and unavoidable destruction of the known world. This kind of story is
labeled as political satire. It’s also quite funny. Rowe makes the point that
this kind of entertainment has just as much bearing in academia as The Great Gatsby. Although she doesn’t
say that verbatim, she implies it. When presented with the historical context
of the film one can be sure that it is meaningful and important in its message.
It may have had a different message in the time of its release but today it has
one message. The cold war was only cold because of the constant threat of total
annihilation.
The two goliath mockumentaries of the
21 century, “Parks and Recreation” and “The Office” can be used to better
understand the socio-political backdrop of 2004-2015 America. In “The Office”
the characters face very real problems of downsizing. This fact is made
apparent before the Great Recession hits! What does this mean? This means the
term downsizing was well known and harped upon before the most recent economic
calamity hit the world in December 2007. How then do the employees of Dunder
Mifflin manage to ride out the year 2008? By way of the fact it is just a TV
show that isn’t really dependent on any economic factors other than those of
its television network. But the employees still deal with the same world we all
live in, well maybe a funnier world. There are probably no bosses like Michael
Scott that haven’t already been fired rightfully. The point is that the sociopolitical
backdrop of the world is referenced in the Mockumentary “The Office.” This is
important because it is a departure from the beloved sitcom “Friends” which
took place in NYC during the 9/11 attacks but never so much as causally references the
attacks in one episode. In the world of “Friends” the twin towers
still stand. The 9/11 attacks are referenced in “The Office” multiple times
because their falling’s effect on the realistic and halfway true world of
reality is what “The Office” is made of. Reality. This particular bit of
pop-culture doesn’t lie to us about the world by negating certain topics on the
forefront of our minds. By sticking to reality “The Office” maintains
historical significance and ceases to be just “pop culture” or “cotton candy.”
Hi Oliver! I'm glad that my blog post inspired your response paper. I wanted to start a conversation. You disagreed with me in a respectful matter, which I appreciated. Not everyone is going to agree with each other. I like the critical thinking you have applied to considering historical context in media. You talk about the portrayals of realism in your blog post. Many of the readings have been about honesty (although the Hess article seems to disagree with this.) Do you think comedy is more amenable to more honest and realistic media portrayals?
ReplyDelete